Our client, a large multidisciplinary NFP operating Specialist Homelessness Services in different parts of NSW, has a deep interest in evidence-based program improvement, coupled with a strategic goal to help end homelessness. They were interested in evidence to better understand: which services were impactful for individuals and collectively; which service model elements were significant in achieving impact; how to expand thinking beyond crisis to more effectively tackle prevention and early intervention; and to identify broader innovation. It was imperative that the work was grounded in national and international research, performance data, and client experience—particularly of Aboriginal clients.

Our team undertook a wide range of activities to answer the question what works, for whom and where. Activities included:

  • Desktop analysis of internal performance data and comparison with AIHW NSW-all data; analysis of demand drivers including trends in homelessness, rent and supply
  • A literature review of current Australian and international thinking
  • Site visits to services across NSW, incorporating detailed discussions with staff about the local service systems and demands, pinch points, their approaches including local innovations
  • Interviews with 40+ current and former clients with lived experience of homelessness, exploring what made the biggest difference for them; interviews with 20+ service partners
  • Regional workshops to test hypotheses
  • Identifying opportunities for improved practice at a systemic and local level, including developing an ongoing internal learning approach.

Our client was very positive about the final report:

  • An executive briefing highlighted support for many of the insights identified, and committed to ongoing organisational learning
  • There was a strong sense of engagement at local services, who reported feeling heard
  • Clients were generous in talking about their experiences and needs, and so deeply influential on recommendations
  • Partners were positive and reinforced the need for reciprocal exchange of efforts.
  • Overall commitment to dedicate resources to ongoing internal improvement efforts.
  • Current tight and unaffordable rental markets across the state are constraining the ability of SHSs to successfully place clients.
  • A lack of synchronicity of necessary supports such as AOD and mental health services with client readiness can drive disengagement by clients.
  • There is a clear need for flexibility in how similar funding sources are applied in different locations; local housing markets and service availability affect which levers can be successful.
  • The single most important factor for clients was a steady trusted case worker, who they felt was on their side. This aligns with research findings.
  • Housing First is still the dominant model internationally; strategies are now focused on how to make the Housing First principles work in local settings and for different cohorts.